By contract dod program software specialist used

These systems involve a mix of acquisition process support, data collection and archiving, and data analytic layers, shedding light on the resources and capabilities that ultimately inform acquisition decisions during execution, management, and oversight.

Question 2: What is the potential to increase the use of analytic capabilities to improve acquisition outcomes?

Conclusion 2. NDRI proposed some example topics where expanded analysis could potentially improve acquisition outcomes:. Recent highly publicized advances in commercial data analytics — including those involving artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data — make it tempting to consider applications of these techniques to acquisition program management. But for a variety of reasons, DoD acquisition programs are not easily amenable to such applications.

For example, DoD programs tend to fail for different reasons, and their numbers are low compared with the huge "training" data sets needed for predictive analytics. In addition, commercial successes using data analytics tend to emanate from highly planned efforts on the part of leadership that is, top down. Many of the individual acquisition functional domains have developed their own data management strategies.

However, an overarching data analytics strategy is needed that provides key strategic questions and identifies the data needed to address those questions. By leveraging private-sector best practices, the DoD has made progress in maturing data collection, access, and analysis in existing systems, although further progress has been hampered by concerns about data sharing.

The importance of data governance in such areas as standardizing data definitions has been recognized. The DoD's program information managers recognize the importance of developing use cases to illustrate the need for data collection and analysis. A persistent barrier to improving acquisition analytics uniformly and sharing data across the various functional communities is the stovepiping of acquisition data management. Concerns about cybersecurity limit the expanded use of commercial software that would increase analytic capabilities.

One possible solution is increased testing of commercial software and disseminating lists of safe analytic tools. Alternatively, the use of virtual computing environments can be used to run commercial software in isolation from DoD networks. Virtual environments solve the problem of isolating security concerns, but they impede data and information flowing in and out of the virtual environments. Security concerns, as well as concerns about excessive oversight and distractions, have limited access to and sharing of data — not only with contractors who conduct data analytics for DoD acquisition domains but even across programs within the DoD and between the DoD and Congress.

Although some recognize the need for data sharing, statutory authorities may be needed to establish and enforce sharing. Data accessibility can be increased through several mechanisms. However, other nongovernment analysts need access to particular data sources. An alternate idea is to develop DoD-wide data access categories, in which analysts would be granted blanket access by appropriate government officials.

Decisionmakers may benefit from ensuring that they have the incentives and authorities needed to appropriately balance insights from data analytics against other strategic considerations e. Also, providing rising decisionmakers with the training and tools to understand how to interpret, weigh the strengths and limitations of, and apply relevant data to decisions could help strengthen the benefits of data analytics for decisionmaking.

Peter D. Vint, and Lieutenant Colonel Mark J. Oppel; and approval by Mr. Brian E. This includes equipment that is used directly or is used by a contractor under a contract with the Army or DoD which requires either the use of such equipment or the use, to a significant extent, of such equipment in the performance of a service or the furnishing of a product.

A, para. DFAS Manual, supra note 2, para. DoD FMR, supra note 5, vol. See, e. See id. DFAS Manual, supra note 2, paras. This includes such functions as requirement determination, distribution management, procurement direction, configuration control and disposal direction.

Asset control includes the authority to monitor equipment availability and take such actions as necessary to restock to approved stockage levels.

DFAS Manual, supra note 2, fig. Follow the procedures at PGI A subsystem of a major weapon system other than a commercially available off-the-shelf item shall be treated as a commercial item and acquired under procedures established for the acquisition of commercial items if—. A A major weapon system that is being acquired, or has been acquired, under procedures established for the acquisition of commercial items in accordance with paragraph a of this section; or.

B A subsystem of a major weapon system that is being acquired, or has been acquired, under procedures established for the acquisition of commercial items in accordance with paragraph b of this section; or. However, no uncertified cost data may be required in any case in which there are sufficient non-Government sales of the same item to establish reasonableness of price. An offeror may be required to submit such information with regard to any other item that was developed exclusively at private expense only after the head of the contracting activity determines in writing that the information submitted pursuant to paragraphs d 1 and 2 of this section is not sufficient to determine the reasonableness of price.

A contracting officer may consider such information or analysis in addition to the information submitted pursuant to paragraphs d 1 and 2 of this section. For additional guidance see PGI The two principal components of the CSDR system are contractor cost data reporting and software resources data reporting. This is a U. Individuals found performing unauthorized activities are subject to disciplinary action including criminal prosecution. Details are available on the federal side of the Acquisition Gateway.

Because these are enhancements of existing agreements, use the same ordering process for any other MAS Information Technology contract. MAS Information Technology features over 5, industry partners offering a wide variety of sustainable commercial IT products and services.

Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts GWACs offer federal agencies access to software, training, and professional services as part of a total IT solution. Refer to the list of all Software agreements for publishers and reseller information. Networx allows federal agencies to build seamless, secure operating environments through customized telecommunications services, including software. Please try again later.